Saturday, December 8, 2012

Bull$#!t Mormon Stories that my Family tells Themselves

We all know that people remember things differently. That's why I was more amused than embarrassed by a conversation my children had the year we were in Saudi Arabia. Several of the kids were living in Provo and deciding what to do for Thanksgiving. The previous two years the rest of the family had agreed to meet the BYU kids in Provo, but since they didn't have the facilities to cook for all ten of us, we had our big meal at a local restaurant. When our oldest daughter, who had recently returned from a mission, offered to host Thanksgiving at her apartment, the others disagreed, saying that it was our "family tradition" to have Thanksgiving at Chuck-A-Rama!!

Little did I know that the stories of Thanksgiving traditions would morph even further. This year, I checked the blog of one of my married daughters, who had posted pictures of the family feast, which I did not attend. I was horrified to read the following:

As you can see there are two different stuffing options available. When I first told E [her husband] that I planned to just make the stuffing from a box and add a few vegetables he almost had a heart attack. He even suggested that I should call his mother to learn how to make stuffing properly haha. I GRACIOUSLY relented and made the stuffing the way his mom does. It was actually fairly easy and didn't add a lot of additional work. Knowing my family is used to the boxed stuff, I also made that. I humbly admit that after it was all said and done EVERYONE, including myself, preferred the stuffing made from "scratch."
Contrary to what you have just read, I, just like E's mother, have my own homemade stuffing recipe. It calls for sticks of butter, cloves of garlic, Jimmy Dean sausage, fresh mushrooms, onions, celery, chicken broth, and bags of herbed Pepperidge Farm bread crumbs. It is delicious and takes hours to make. I was so upset by the intimation that our family is used to the "boxed stuff" that I actually shed tears of frustration when I read this post. Why had I spent all of those early Thanksgiving morning hours while the rest of the family slept preparing that stuffing when they would end up remembering that it came from a box?

I have noticed that the family narrative has made quite a shift in the year since I have left my difficult marriage of 30 years. Stories surrounding my leaving vary in detail from what I recall and don't reflect my motivations. Recollections of family life have been reconstructed to demonstrate that I was never a very good Mormon mother. Despite spiral-bound notebooks of minutes written in childish scrawl and cassette tapes of costumed Christmas pageants and testimony-bearings, we "never" had Family Home Evenings. All of my nagging to gather for scripture study has also been lost in the annals of time, since we never did that, either. In short, I was an absentee parent who only in her own head threw birthday parties, created original handmade Halloween costumes before the advent of Pinterest, devised elaborate (winning) school science fair projects, and taught eight children how to read and how to swim before age three. (And incidentally, kept them all alive until adulthood.)

I understand that my children (nearly all of them grown and living on their own), are devastated by the breakup of our marriage. The status of an eternal family is now in question. Perhaps the stories they have created are helpful to them as they try to make sense of this new situation. Narrative adjustments are a normal thing that people do when they suffer dislocation of belief. When the world doesn't match their expectations they tell themselves a story that helps to make sense of it all. I just hate being cast as the wicked monster in their dark fairy tales.

Tonight I have just returned from seeing the film version of "Life of Pi." In this movie, Pi tells two stories about his ordeal as a shipwreck survivor. One is more empirical, the other symbolic and designed to help him deal with the wild side of himself which helped him to survive. I think Pi rather liked his fanciful tale, and wanted others to see the truth in it, but at least he was able to recognize that there were two ways of looking at his experience. He also realized that he himself was the Bengal tiger in his own story.

I hope that one day the children who have vowed never to speak to me again will relent. I hope they'll be able to see me as a mother who loved them and was motivated by good. There is a scene in the Life of Pi where he and the tiger are so weak and emaciated that they can no longer continue their savage conflict. Harsh conditions in the manifest world have stripped them naked. Pi sits down next to the beast and cradles the large, fearsome head on his lap. It is a touching moment.


8 comments:

Vajra said...

I try to let my family tell their stories even when they are filled with innacuracies and imagination. But I sometimes wish they would do the same for me...

{{{You}}}

Vajra said...

I try to let my family tell their stories even when they are filled with innacuracies and imagination. But I sometimes wish they would do the same for me...

{{{You}}}

C. L. Hanson said...

Wow, {{{hugs}}} -- I am so sorry to hear that happened to you!!

You're right that it's human nature to reinterpret the narrative, and when someone leaves an organization, they get recast as the scapegoat for everything. But (as human nature as it is) I can't imagine how it must be to get that from your own kids.

It makes me want to be sure to show my mom some appreciation. She did all that stuff you mentioned, but never perfectly (eg. sometimes from scratch, but sometimes she had other things to do), so it would sure be possible to reinterpret it as "we almost never had FHE". But what she did do in terms of scripture study and FHE and family job charts, etc., was so much work (with the kids, being kids, dragging their heels every step of the way) that it would be tragic to recast it as though she'd never done those things at all...

LDS Anarchist said...

This reminds me of my sister, who, as we were visiting together in my home, revealed that our brother did not baptize her into the church. She had had a falling out with him when they were adults and had completely erased from her memory this fact. When I repeatedly testified to her that he did, indeed, baptize her, her mind at first fought the idea, and then she finally decided that perhaps her memory was off on that, but that she still did not recall it.

I also see this all the time in a lot of people. Bad feeling and experiences will color the memory and make it selective. For example, my wife will routinely remember the latter 75% of something, in which bad feelings ensued, but will be unable to recall the first 25% which preceded and caused it all. Also, I find that people can recall the wrong things that others did to them, but not the wrong things that they did to others.

I suppose selective memory helps us deal with feelings of guilt and embarrassment, pain and anguish, by excising offending memories from our banks, so that we don't have to relive them by remembering them.

On a more personal note, so are you guys now officially divorced?

Justin said...

It's called hindsight bias -- it's an artifact of how our brains are wired.

We move through our experiences backwards -- facing the past, while walking into the future. Things happening in the present are then fit [retrospectively] into the memory narrative the brain calls "Me" and "My Life".

The brain either ignores/forgets things that are happening that are inconsistent with the story it tells about itself -- or it will change the story about your past experiences ["memories"] to make the new thing fit in.

It's the way it avoids cognitive dissonance. Telling itself a more simplistic story about events, a story that fits in better with what it wants to believe about the world.

There's been research observing the brain activity of people doing a Coke/Pepsi blind taste test. Someone's brain would measurably prefer the taste of Pepsi -- but when they were told it was Pepsi [and they thought they liked Coke better] -- the researches could see the memory centers of their brain lighting-up. They were re-working the memory of the taste test so they could "remember" having liked the Coke [even though they really didn't].

I saw it happen with my parents when they got divorced. The brain reasons that if the marriage went south, then the other spouse must've been a really awful person -- and there must've been signs everywhere that this would happen.

Michael Carpenter said...

I second what Justin said about hindsight bias.

I also recently read about some research that shows that we apparently modify every memory every time it is recalled. So, when you share a memory with someone you store it back in your brain in a slightly modified form. Even when you just recall it to yourself.

So, we are all constantly modifying our memories. Our brains are not video or audio recorders, although it sometimes feels that way and we often treat them as if they were.

My brother is one year younger than I am and he and I recall the same incidents in completely different ways. He's much more of a story teller than I am and I claim that he has modified some of those memories to contain lessons (often for his own children) that weren't really there.

And, as always, big hugs to BiV. I love you, sister. I'm going through many of the same issues with my children, having also left my 30 year marriage this year. So, I know exactly where you are coming from.

Ben said...

I'll hope for a Christmas miracle. If not this year, some year! Let's hope those good memories of you come to the top of their brains someday.

Erin said...

This is beautiful.
I felt so sad too when I read the words about the "box", just KNOWING that you had certainly prepared it from scratch ... and also knowing that even if the stuffing was from a box, you gave your heart, time, soul, etc. to your children. (((((hugs))))) and yes, I think they will continue to tell stories, but they will shift again ...